1 / 13

Collimator Wire Measurements

Collimator Wire Measurements. F. Caspers, T. Kroyer. Measurement Strategy. 0.5 mm diameter copper wire placed in center of collimator Mainly the highly sensitive resonator method was applied

velasquezc
Télécharger la présentation

Collimator Wire Measurements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Collimator Wire Measurements F. Caspers, T. Kroyer

  2. Measurement Strategy • 0.5 mm diameter copper wire placed in center of collimator • Mainly the highly sensitive resonator method was applied • Semi-automized routine implemented on network analyser to speed up tedious repetitive measurement tasks • Time domain transmission measurements used to find out the line impedance Z0 that is needed for evaluation of the resonator data • Measurements were performed for many jaw positions

  3. Time Domain Step Mode Measurement • S11 measured in step mode • At each position S11 can be read and the line impedance Z0 calculated from the relation Z0 = 50W*(1+S11)/(1-S11) • Values for Z0 determined for the region of the collimator jaws and for the transition pieces S11 in low pass step mode • Collimator open: flat response • Collimator closed: big drop • Slope in jaw region mainly due to attenuation and not to a real change in line impedance • Z0 of transition pieces differs significantly from Z0 of jaws • 1200 mm jaw length used, 100 mm long transitions on either extremity neglected Transition Transition Jaws

  4. Line Impedance for Different Jaw Positions • Line impedance at the positions of the jaws measured using S11 and S22, averaged data in red curve • Theoretical value calculated for wire between two infinitely extended perfectly conducting planes in blue curve • Theoretical data systematically lower than measured data => WHY??? skin depth should not play so big a role

  5. Effective Jaw Aperture • Using the measured line impedance, the effective aperture was calculated by inverting the formula on the previous page • The effective half aperture is roughly 1.5 mm bigger than the mechanical aperture • This corresponds to the skin depth at 1 MHz using the DC graphite resistivity of 10 mW*m of the graphite [1] • A linear frequency sweep between 1 MHz and 2 GHz was used for the measurement [1] Assmann, R. et al., LHC Collimation: Design And Results From Prototyping And Beam Tests

  6. Resonator Measurement • The TEM transmission line composed of the collimator jaws and the wire can be used as a TEM resonator • Capacitive coupling with low coupling coefficient k chosen, k = S21/(1-S21) • Loaded quality factor QL measured for each peak as well as S21 • Line attenuationa can be easily calculated from • with Q0 = QL * (1+k) • For too strong coupling, the unloaded Q factor can be obtained by correcting the measured Q factor knowing S21 • For too weak coupling the Q measurement gets impacted by noise • An appropriate coupling coefficient between this two extremes was chosen

  7. Resonance Pattern • The typical resonance pattern for open and closed collimator is plotted below • Equidistant peaks when the collimator is open, variable peak spacing when it is closed

  8. Typical Resonator Results • Q factor measured at 20 resonance peaks below 1500 MHz • Total attenuation only slightly above the values calculated for the wire used • Wire attenuation removed using with the wire conductivity r, wire diameter d and the outer conductor diameter D; ln(D/d) can be found from the measured line impedance Z0; separate correction necessary for the transition pieces, since they have got a Z0 different from the jaws Collimator fully open

  9. Determination of Impedance • The DC resistance R0 of a wire of length L, resistivity r and diameter d is given by • For skin depths d small compared to d the high frequency resistance R = R0 * d/(4d) • This resistance is proportional to the line attenuation • Comparing the measured collimator attenuation to the calculated wire attenuation the real part of the collimator impedance can be found Detail - Collimator fully open All Data - Collimator fully open

  10. Impedance for Different Apertures • The jaws were moved in symmetrically • In a simple DC resistance measurement, the wire was found to be ~0.3 mm offset from the center Aperture Aperture All Data Detail

  11. Wire offset Transverse Sweep (1/3) • Aperture kept at 10 mm • Jaws moved together from the center to the side; a positive offset means that the wire is closer to the right jaw

  12. Transverse Sweep (2/3) • Wire offset swept in 0.5 mm steps from -4.2 to +4.8 mm

  13. Full Transverse Sweep (3/3) • The resonator peaks below 500 MHz as a function of the wire offset • First sweep in the range from +0.3 to +4.8 mm, second sweep from +0.3 mm to -4.2 mm. Discontinuity in the center of the traces as a consequence of long time drift

More Related