1 / 30

BID-MAeHC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Steering Committee Meeting

BID-MAeHC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Steering Committee Meeting. October 19, 2009. AGENDA. AGENDA. Measure Development Working Group Data Transport and Connectivity Working Group Reporting Working Group Web OMR Working Group Project Plan-Timeline Key Issues for Discussion Next Steps.

cissy
Télécharger la présentation

BID-MAeHC DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Steering Committee Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BID-MAeHC DEMONSTRATION PROJECTSteering Committee Meeting October 19, 2009

  2. AGENDA AGENDA • Measure Development Working Group • Data Transport and Connectivity Working Group • Reporting Working Group • Web OMR Working Group • Project Plan-Timeline • Key Issues for Discussion • Next Steps

  3. Measure Consolidation Process • Measure specifications were derived from • HIT Standards Committee (Meaningful Use) • BID Clinical Standards WG (derivative of TCNY) • MAeHC QDC • Process • Measures were grouped into categories and sub-categories to streamline the consolidation process • All HIT Standards Committee measures were kept • BID contract incentive items were flagged and kept • All remaining measures were assessed for similarities and excluded if the measure was identified as the same based upon definition, numerator, denominator, and coding specifications • Measures were also excluded if they were based upon specific needs that did not apply to BID • As of October 16th, 97 measures were consolidated down to 72 • Detailed specifications still need to be defined by the HIT Standards Committee • Additional measures may be excluded once this happens

  4. Measure Consolidation Process

  5. Measures as of October 16, 2009

  6. Measure Details

  7. Measure Details (II)

  8. Measure Details (III)

  9. Measure Details (IV)

  10. Measure Details (IV)

  11. AGENDA AGENDA • Measure Development Working Group • Data Transport and Connectivity Working Group • Reporting Working Group • Web OMR Working Group • Project Plan-Timeline • Key Issues for Discussion • Next Steps

  12. Proposed High Level Design

  13. Data Transport and Connectivity WG Key conversation points and decisions taken: • Utilize C32 Document type • Implement as many of the HIT Privacy and Security Standards as isappropriate Access, Authentication, Authorization – Role based Secure transmission of data (TLS) Auditing De-identification and Re-identification • Reviewed data elements available from source systems (ECW and webOMR)

  14. Draft - C32 Data Element Requirements Source: HITSP CDA Content Modules Component

  15. Draft - C32 Data Element Requirements Source: HITSP CDA Content Modules Component

  16. Draft - C32 Data Element Requirements Source: HITSP CDA Content Modules Component

  17. AGENDA AGENDA • Measure Development Working Group • Data Transport and Connectivity Working Group • Reporting Working Group • Web OMR Working Group • Project Plan-Timeline • Key Issues for Discussion • Next Steps

  18. BIDPO Reporting Dimensions

  19. Administrative Report Categories and Views

  20. AGENDA AGENDA • Measure Development Working Group • Data Transport and Connectivity Working Group • Reporting Working Group • Web OMR Working Group • Project Plan-Timeline • Key Issues for Discussion • Next Steps

  21. AGENDA AGENDA • Measure Development Working Group • Data Transport and Connectivity Working Group • Reporting Working Group • Web OMR Working Group • Project Plan-Timeline • Key Issues for Discussion • Next Steps

  22. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

  23. I Design II III IV HIGH-LEVEL SCHEDULE • Project phases • June 2010 • April 2010 • January 2010 • October 2009 • August2009 Measure Spec/Analysis Update Database Design/Schema Application/Reports Design DEV/TEST SYS Prep Develop Upgrade Data Transport Method Modify APP/dB Internal Testing TEST Data Validation First Pilot PROD SYS Prep Implement Enable Live Data Feed Install dB/App • Key dates Project Kickoff Measure Acceptance Go-Live Signoff Development Completed

  24. Project Plan

  25. Project Plan

  26. Project Plan

  27. AGENDA AGENDA • Measure Development Working Group • Data Transport and Connectivity Working Group • Reporting Working Group • Web OMR Working Group • Project Plan-Timeline • Key Issues for Discussion • Next Steps

  28. Key Issue for Discussion: Privacy and Security • Identified versus de-identified Patient Information • Name • Enterprise ID • Address (Town, Zip) • Compliance with Security Standards • Encryption of data at rest – should that include the database?

  29. AGENDA AGENDA • Measure Development Working Group • Data Transport and Connectivity Working Group • Reporting Working Group • Web OMR Working Group • Project Plan-Timeline • Key Issues for Discussion • Next Steps

  30. Next Steps • Acceptance of finalized Measure Set • MAeHC Statement of Work • Legal Agreements between parties (BIDPO, BIDMC, MAeHC, CSC) • Establishment of HW infrastructure to support the new QDC

More Related