1 / 41

Project Steering Committee Meeting - GFATM R7

Project Steering Committee Meeting - GFATM R7. NACO, New Delhi September 6, 2010. PF Indicator Status at P-8. Body text comes here – 18 point verdana/arial. PF Indicator Status at P-8. Body text comes here – 18 point verdana/arial. Report on GFATM Phase II Renewal.

sarah-cooper
Télécharger la présentation

Project Steering Committee Meeting - GFATM R7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project Steering Committee Meeting - GFATM R7 NACO, New Delhi September 6, 2010

  2. PF Indicator Status at P-8 Body text comes here – 18 point verdana/arial

  3. PF Indicator Status at P-8 Body text comes here – 18 point verdana/arial

  4. Report on GFATM Phase II Renewal • Phase 2 documentation submitted on time, review & negotiations with LFA June 1 – July 17, 2010 • Reallocation of Phase 2 training budget for scaling supportive supervision – reprogramming & material change – technical review & board approval • Type 1 extension: September – November, 2010 • Conservative targets –Type 1 extension, incremental increase to Phase 1 • Full programme implementation – Phase 2 • Fund situation critical due to effective & full utilization of grant.

  5. PF for Type-I Extension

  6. Rationalization of Training Institutes • Prevalence levels • Training load in the context of upscaling/saturation • Current utilization of existing institutions • Quality of training undertaken so far • - based on counselors feedback • Financial Management Systems (grant utilization & integrity) • One institution in every state for supportive supervision • Availability of funds to take on new institutions • Implications on the MIS and FMS systems • 10% efficiency gains in all phase II budgets by the GF • Effective utilization of grant.

  7. Training Load and MT Utilization(BU & its SSRs- Karnataka, AP, TN & Kerala) * Includes all induction and refresher training programmes conducted for counselors/Staff nurses since start of GFATM, R7, CC

  8. Training Load and MT Utilization(JMI & SSRs - NCT, Haryana, Punjab, J&K)

  9. Training Load and MT Utilization(LU & SSRs - UP, Uttrakhand, Orissa, West Bengal)

  10. Training Load and MT Utilization(RIMS & SSRs - Nagaland, Manipur, Mizroam, Assam)

  11. Training Load and MT Utilization(CSWNN & SSRs - Maharashtra, MP and Goa)

  12. Training Load and MT Utilization(TISS-SR & SSRs – Gujarat, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, Bihar, HP)

  13. Utilization of Training Institutions up to P7

  14. Based on parameters for rationalization…

  15. Disbursements to SR & SSR • The chart shows the actual disbursement against budgeted disbursement. Against a total grant agreement budget of Rs.16 crores till June 2010, 112%has been disbursed • SRs disbursement is 1% less because of non disbursement to Bangalore University due to non compliance with financial policies • SSRs were disbursed more than the grant agreement budget on account of field visits for master trainers, FIC honorarium ,AAA’s salary, etc • Paid from foreign exchange gain at PR level with approval of donor

  16. Budget of Phase II • This chart shows budget proposed for Phase II for the period 1st Sept 2010 to 31st August 2013. • The SSRs stand at 53% of entire budget as the supportive supervision will mostly be held at field level. Whereas • The SR is at 19% of entire budget & PR is at 28% . • There will be frequent monitoring visits both by the PR & SR. SRs will also implement supportive supervision at field level.

  17. Phase I Budget - SR

  18. Phase I Budget - SSR

  19. Phase II Budget - SR

  20. Phase II Budget - SSR

  21. Status of Resource Materials

  22. Visual Voices Visual Voices

  23. Visual Voices – ‘ZindaLaash’ • After watching this film, how do you think Bollywood portrays women in sex work? • How would stereotypes or pre-conceived notions on sex work impact HIV/AIDS counselling? • Does your view of sex work differ from that of mainstream society? What are some of the differences and / or similarities? • What do you see as key principles when working with a stigmatized community like sex workers? • What are the challenges you experience in counselling women in sex work?

  24. Quality Assurance Mechanisms

  25. Quality Assurance & Capacity Building for Master Trainers

  26. Master Trainers – Evidence Based Capacity Building

  27. GMaT A - Self awareness as a Trainer SR wise mean scores of master trainers on perception about self awareness * Significant at 5% level of significance Theoretical score range: 10 to 50

  28. GMaT A -Theoretical & Conceptual Knowledge related to Training Perception about theoretical & conceptual knowledge * Significant at 5% level of significance Theoretical score range: 10 to 50

  29. GMaT A - Skills & Techniques related to Pedagogy Perception about skills & techniques (pedagogy) ** Not Significant at 5% level of significance Theoretical score range: 10 to 50

  30. GMaT A - Attitudes On attitudes towards HIV/AIDS related issues * Significant at 5% level of significance Theoretical score range: 10 to 50

  31. The GMaT A Scores - Mean Scores by SR SR wise mean GMaT scores of master trainers Theoretical score range: 60 to 300 ** Not significant

  32. Knowledge, Attitudes & Skills of HIV Counselling Based on the pre-test assessment conducted at the time of 12 day induction training programme. Grade-C: 0-33 percent, Grade-B: 34-66 percent, Grade-A: 67-100 percent

  33. SR wise Average Resource Person Evaluation Score (NACO evaluation) SR wise average resource evaluation scores of master trainers Note: 1=Very much Disagree , 2=Somewhat Disagree, 3=Do not know, 4=Somewhat agree, 5=Very much agree

  34. Average Resource Person Evaluation Scores (NACO evaluation forms) Distribution of master trainers by average resource person evaluation scores Note: 1=Very much Disagree , 2=Somewhat Disagree, 3=Do not know, 4=Somewhat agree, 5=Very much agree

  35. Scaling up Supportive Supervision

  36. Extent of Scale Up… ** Special Provision for North East

  37. Operationalizing the roll out …

  38. Identification of Mentors - Feedback from SACS

  39. On Site Mentoring • On site visit, quarterly • Review cases, professional growth issues, etc… • Annual administering of ACE • Biannual group conferences with mentor • Positive feedback from counselors in the pilot roll out. • Strong support from SACS.

  40. Systems Strengthening Measures… • Annual 3 day refresher for all mentors • Monthly reports to SACS and quarterly feedback meetings with SACS. • Half day workshops for mentors on a quarterly basis • Biannual review meetings with NACO

  41. Thank You

More Related