SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Mobility

hanley avatar
18 diapositives · 360 Views · Aug 01, 2014

Mobility. MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION. Jonathan B. Paul, AICP MA 2 & Jeffrey L. Hays. TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT (TND) & TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD). THE ADOPTION OF THE

Mobility - slide 1
01 / 18Mobility
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Mobility
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Mobility MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION Jonathan B. Paul, AICP MA2& Jeffrey L. Hays

  2. TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT (TND) & TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD)

  3. THE ADOPTION OF THE MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION PROGRAM (MMTM) IS THE MOST IMPORTANT REASONS WHY DCA DID NOT OBJECT TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMPONENT OF THE MOBILITY PLAN OR URBAN SERVICE AREA / TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA NO SPRINGHILL, SANTA FE, NEWBERRY VILLAGE OR CELEBRATION POINTE

  4. MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION PROGRAM (MMTM) • APPLIES TO PROJECT W/O CONCURRENCY • STREAMLINED CONCURRENCY PROCESS • 1x PAYMENT TO MITIGATE IMPACT • ELIMINATE CONCURRENCY UNCERTAINTY • DETERMINE PROJECT MITIGATION • SIMPLER TO WORK OUT FINANCING • SIMPLE LOOK-UP TABLE • INTEGRATES TOD & TND

  5. MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICTS

  6. IMPACT FEE VS. MITIGATION LEGISLATIVE UNCERTAINTY • Did not formally enact Mobility Fee • Constantly changing statues • Upcoming session • Funding transit CONCURRENCY RESERVATION • Projects with CLSC – Pay Impact Fee • Mitigation specific to concurrency • Reduce confusion - fee vs. mitigation • Vested rights concerns

  7. MMTM PROJECTS • CONSISTENT WITH COMP PLAN & CIE • Roadways • Dedicated Transit Lanes • Trails and Paths • Buses • Bus Maintenance Facility • Park and Ride • Peak Hour Transit Service – 10%

  8. MMTM PROCESS • MMTM APPLIES TO PROJECTS W/O CLSC • EVALUATE PROJECTS CLSC & TRAFFIC • SUBMIT MMTM AGREEMENT @ PRELIMINARY • AGREEMENT APPROVED BEFORE FINAL • OPTION – APPROVE AGREEMENT @ PRELIM • RECORD AGREEMENT WITH CLERK • NEXT STEP - ASSESS MITIGATION • PROPOSED - BOCC APPROVE AGREEMENT • OPTION 1 – CTY MGR APPROVE AGREEMENT • OPTION 2 – CMO APPROVE AGREEMENT

  9. MMTM ASSESSMENT • ASSESSED @ BUILDING PERMIT • PAYABLE @ FINAL INSPECTION • OPTION - PAY @ DEVELOPMENT PLAN • PAYMENT INCENTIVE: • 15% reduction pay @ Development Plan • 7.5% reduction pay @ Building Permit • 0% reduction @ Final Inspection

  10. COMPLEX MMTM FORMULA VMTg = VMTf - VMTb Tcfl = Cc – Cr Ttofl = Toc - Cr VMTr = (Tcfl / VMTg) + (Ttofl / VMTg) VMTp = (Tg* Atl) * .5) * (1 - %CC) * (%NT) Multi-Modal Transportation Mitigation = VMTr * VMTp

  11. SIMPLIFIED MMTM TABLE

  12. SIMPLIFIED MMTM TABLE - RETAIL

  13. TRUE ROAD PLAN VS. MMTM COST SOURCE: MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION WHITE PAPER

  14. FUNDING NEEDS • MMTM WILL NOT FULLY FUND NEEDS • NEED FOR MORE STABLE SOURCE • MTPO / STATE / FEDERAL • BACKLOG / TIF PLAN – ONE SOURCE • TRANSIT FUNDING NEXT SLIDE

  15. TRANSIT FUNDING NEEDS • NEED RECURRING REVENUE SOURCE • UF PAY GREATER SHARE IN FUTURE • SANTA FE COLLEGE • BACKLOG / TIF PLAN • NEED REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY • NEED REGIONAL FUNDING MECHANISM

  16. QUESTIONS COMMENTS JonathanB. Paul, AICP MA2 - jbpaul@alachuacounty.us Jeffrey L. Hays – jhays@alachuacounty.us